The documentation set for this product strives to use bias-free language. For the purposes of this documentation set, bias-free is defined as language that does not imply discrimination based on age, disability, gender, racial identity, ethnic identity, sexual orientation, socioeconomic status, and intersectionality. Exceptions may be present in the documentation due to language that is hardcoded in the user interfaces of the product software, language used based on RFP documentation, or language that is used by a referenced third-party product. Learn more about how Cisco is using Inclusive Language.
Sizing the components of the Preferred Architecture for Enterprise Collaboration solution is an important part of the overall solution design.
For a given deployment, the goal of the sizing process is to determine:
For the products that are deployed with virtualization, this corresponds to the selection of the virtual machine hardware specification defined in the Open Virtual Archive (OVA) template and the number of virtual machines. For the products that are not deployed with virtualization, this corresponds to the type and number of appliances or blades.
Sizing can be a complex exercise because of numerous parameters to take into considerations. In order to simplify the sizing exercise, this chapter provides some sizing examples with corresponding assumptions. We will refer to these sizing examples as simplified sizing deployments. If the requirements of your particular deployment are within those assumptions, then you can use the simplified sizing deployments in this document as a reference. If not, then the normal sizing calculations have to be performed as described in the Sizing chapter in the latest version of the Cisco Collaboration SRND and product documentation available at https://www.cisco.com/go/srnd.
Once the sizing is done for the products that are deployed with virtualization, determine how to place the virtual machines on Cisco Unified Computing System (UCS) servers, and consider the co-residency rules. Ultimately, this virtual machine placement process determines how many UCS servers are required for the solution.
This chapter explains sizing for all modules that are covered in this document, namely: Call Control, Conferencing, Collaboration Edge, and Voice Messaging. This chapter also covers Virtual Machine Placement and Platforms.
For products that are deployed as virtual machines, this document does not provide details on the virtual machine OVA template specification. For that information, refer to the documentation on Cisco Collaboration Virtualization, available at https://www.cisco.com/go/virtualized-collaboration.
Table 9-1 lists the topics that are new in this chapter or that have changed significantly from previous releases of this document.
|
|
|
---|---|---|
Cisco Prime License Manager has been replaced by Cisco Smart Software Manager and is no longer covered in this chapter. |
For information on Cisco Smart Software Manager, see the chapter on Collaboration Management Services. |
|
As discussed in the Call Control chapter, the Cisco Unified Communications Manager (Unified CM) and IM and Presence Service are provided through a Unified CM cluster and an IM and Presence cluster.
A Cisco Unified CM cluster consists of one publisher node, two dedicated TFTP servers, and one or multiple call processing node pairs. The number of call processing pairs depends on the size of the deployment and is discussed later in this section. The call processing nodes are deployed in pairs for 1:1 redundancy.
IM and Presence nodes are also deployed in pairs. The number of IM and Presence pairs also depends on the size of the deployment, and this will be discussed later in this section. The IM and Presence nodes are deployed in pairs for 1:1 redundancy.
For Unified CM, the simplified sizing guidance covers deployments with up to 10,000 users and 10,000 devices. Unified CM supports more users and more devices under different assumptions or by adding more call processing pairs, but this is outside the scope of the simplified sizing guidance provided in this chapter. Table 9-2 describes the simplified sizing deployments. The assumptions made for those deployments are documented below this table. If the number of users or endpoints in your deployment is outside of the values in Table 9-2 , or if the requirements of your specific deployment fall outside of the assumptions, do not use these simplified sizing deployments, but rather perform the normal sizing procedure documented in the Sizing chapter in the latest version of the Cisco Collaboration SRND available at https://www.cisco.com/go/srnd and in the Unified CM product documentation available at
https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/unified-communications/unified-communications-manager-callmanager/tsd-products-support-series-home.html
Table 9-2 sizes deployments based on the maximum number of users and devices, whichever number is greater. For example, in a deployment with 5,000 users and an average of two devices per user (for example, each user has a desk phone and a Jabber client in softphone mode), the 7-node deployment is required because there are 10,000 devices in total.
The 7.5k-user virtual machine configuration (OVA template) is used in these simplified sizing deployments in order to optimize the overall resources consumed on the UCS server. This OVA template requires a full UC performance CPU platform such as the Cisco Business Edition 7000; and it is not supported on the Business Edition 6000, for example. For more information on those OVA virtual machine configuration templates and on the platform requirements, refer to the documentation at https://www.cisco.com/go/virtualized-collaboration.
A Unified CM call processing pair deployed with the 7.5k-user OVA template could support up to 7,500 users under some conditions. But in this design, we use some assumptions that put an additional load on Unified CM; for instance, we assume that each user can be configured with a Remote Destination Profile for Single Number Reach, each user can use Extension Mobility, each endpoint can be CTI controlled, some shared lines are configured, mobile and remote access is enabled, and so forth. Therefore the capacity per Unified CM call processing pair is reduced, as shown in Table 9-2 . The following description provides more information on the assumptions used in this simplified sizing model.
The following assumptions apply to the two simplified sizing deployments listed in Table 9-2 :
Other capacity limits that are applicable to the Cisco Collaboration solution and that are documented in the latest version of the Cisco Collaboration SRND and product documentation, also apply. For example:
For IM and Presence, simplified sizing guidance covers deployments of a single Unified CM cluster and IM and Presence subcluster with up to 15,000 devices. Table 9-3 describes the simplified sizing deployments. If the number of users or logged-in Jabber endpoints in your deployment is outside of the values in Table 9-3 , do not use these simplified sizing deployments, but rather perform the normal sizing procedure documented in the Sizing chapter in the latest version of the Cisco Collaboration SRND and product documentation.
|
|
---|---|
Between 5,000 and 15,000 users or logged-in Jabber endpoints |
For example, if a deployment has 5,000 users and each user on average is logged on to two Jabber endpoints concurrently, then the capacity is limited by the 10,000 logged-in Jabber endpoints, and therefore this deployment requires one IM and Presence pair using the 15k-user OVA template. The two OVA virtual machine configuration templates in Table 9-3 require a full Unified Communications performance CPU platform such as the Cisco Business Edition 7000. For more information on those OVA virtual machine configuration templates and on the platform requirements, refer to the documentation available at https://www.cisco.com/go/virtualized-collaboration.
The two IM and Presence nodes are deployed as a pair in order to provide redundancy if one of the nodes fails.
In some cases IM and Presence nodes may require additional resources and thus larger OVA templates to operate effectively. IM and presence features have significant impact on system performance above and beyond the number of users assigned to IM and Presence and the number of devices per user.
Note OVA size refers to the total number of devices and does not reflect the impact the above features have on IM and Presence.
The following IM and Presence deployment types and features will require 15k-user OVA or higher OVA template:
Failure to provide additional resources by using a larger OVA template for IM and Presence deployment types and features above will result in higher system CPU, IM and Presence service core dumps, persistent chat and other performance related issues.
The number of phones and DNs supported on a Cisco Integrated Services Router (ISR) in Survivable Remote Site Telephony (SRST) mode depends on the platform. Table 9-4 provides a capacity example. For information on other SRST platforms, including information on the required amount of DRAM and flash memory, refer to the Cisco Unified SRST documentation available at
https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/unified-communications/unified-survivable-remote-site-telephony/products-device-support-tables-list.html
|
|
|
---|---|---|
Sizing a deployment for conferencing is primarily an exercise in deciding how many concurrent connections are required to Cisco Meeting Server. Considerations include:
Conference resources are generally dedicated to a region in order to keep as much of the conference media on the regional network; therefore, sizing can be considered on a region-by-region basis.
Audio and video conference sizing depends heavily on specific details about the customer, their user base, and their conferencing habits. The guidelines in this section can be used as a basis for sizing a conferencing deployment, but user-to-port ratios will vary greatly depending on the deployment environment and the requirements of the organization.
Table 9-5 shows suggested ratios to start planning conference resource requirements. These numbers vary depending on the capabilities of deployed endpoints, availability of alternative audio conferencing such as Cisco WebEx, and users' comfort level in creating and joining conferences. As a starting point, the following formulas can be used to calculate port requirements:
|
|
|
---|---|---|
The numbers in Table 9-5 can be used for either scheduled or non-scheduled conferencing. It is expected that, for scheduled meetings, customers can use existing usage data to draw more definite conclusions about concurrent meeting usage.
Understanding what type of meetings a customer expects to take place will help further refine the number of ports required. The total number of ports can be calculated with the formula:
Total ports = <Average number of participants in a meeting> ∗ <Concurrent meetings>
For example, with 3,000 users, Table 9-5 suggests 208 ports. This can, for instance, correspond to an average of 3 participants per meeting and 69 concurrent meetings, or an average of 6 participants per meeting and 34 concurrent meetings. By assessing the suggested port numbers in this manner, it is easier to determine whether the total number of ports is likely to be sufficient for the deployment.
Another important point to consider is what the maximum meeting size is likely to be. In most cases the largest meeting is an all-hands meeting type. For instance, if a customer has 1,000 users but has a requirement to join 96 systems in an all-hands TelePresence conference, this would override the 75 port suggestion.
Cisco Meeting Server is available in several different models and platforms with differing conference support and scalability. Table 9-6 lists the recommended Cisco Meeting Server platforms for enterprise deployments, along with their associated per-node port capacities. These numbers are valid with non-encrypted and encrypted media and signaling. For more information on Cisco Meeting Server clustering, for information on other Cisco Meeting Server platforms, or for information on other video and data channel resolutions, refer to the Cisco Meeting Server and Cisco Meeting App Data Sheet, available at
https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/conferencing/meeting-server/datasheet-listing.html
|
|
|
|
---|---|---|---|
There are other considerations to keep in mind too. For example, a Cisco Meeting Server supports a maximum of 450 participants in each conference per node, and this capacity can be increased by adding Cisco Meeting Server nodes.
We recommend two simplified sizing deployments for Cisco TMS, illustrated in Table 9-7 . There are other possible TMS deployments, but they are not covered in this guide. For instance, the single server deployment that has all TMS, TMSXE, and Microsoft SQL components residing in the same virtual machine is not described here because it does not provide redundancy.
The two deployments in Table 9-7 provide high availability. The redundant node is deployed for resiliency, not for scalability. A load balancer providing a single virtual IP address for the primary and backup nodes is also required.
Other factors that influence Cisco TMS performance and scaling include:
For more information on sizing Cisco TMS, refer to the Cisco TelePresence Management Suite Installation and Upgrade Guide, available at
https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/conferencing/telepresence-management-suite-tms/products-installation-guides-list.html
There are two VM configurations for Cisco Meeting Management Suite, depending on the number of Cisco Meeting Server call bridges, the number of call legs started at peak time across all call bridges, and the number of users signed into Meeting Management at the same time. For more information, refer to the latest version of the Cisco Meeting Management Installation and Configuration Guide, available at
https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/conferencing/meeting-management/products-installation-guides-list.html
This section covers sizing of Cisco Expressway and Cisco Unified Border Element, two key components of the Collaboration Edge.
Table 9-8 shows the maximum capacity that a single Expressway node can handle at any point of time when using the medium OVA template.
The Expressway nodes are clustered together to provide redundancy and larger scalability. The cluster configurations that are recommended and that are covered in this document consist of clusters of 2, 3, or 6 nodes. Table 9-9 shows the cluster capacity for those recommended deployments. It is important to note that all of the deployment models account for redundancy. With a cluster of 2 or 3 nodes, one node can fail without impacting the cluster capacity (N+1 redundancy). With a full cluster of 6 nodes, two nodes can fail without impacting the cluster capacity (N+2 redundancy).
In order to better understand the relationship between the cluster capacity and the level of redundancy, the following example analyses the video capacity during normal operations and after a failover, using the medium OVA template:
The maximum video call capacity per node is 100 sessions. In a 3-node cluster in a non-resilient deployment, the video call cluster capacity is 300, but it would be reduced by one-third if one node fails. In order to provide resiliency and maintain the cluster capacity if one of the three nodes fails, the recommended high-available 3-node cluster capacity is limited to 200 video sessions. During normal operations, video calls are load-balanced across the cluster, with each node handling approximately 66 video calls. If one node fails, the remaining nodes can then handle all 200 video sessions because each node can handle 100 video sessions, and therefore the cluster capacity is maintained.
|
|
|
|
---|---|---|---|
3.Proxy registration considerations apply only to mobile and remote access, not to business-to-business communications. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||
4.Proxy registration considerations apply only to mobile and remote access, not to business-to-business communications. |
Note There are two other OVA templates available, the small and the large OVA templates. The small OVA template is designed to run on the Cisco Business Edition 6000M or 6000H. The large OVA template is not supported with the Cisco Business Edition 7000, and it is supported only with limited hardware. There is also an option to use a hardware appliance, the Cisco Expressway CE1200. Refer to the documentation at https://www.cisco.com/go/virtualized-collaboration for more information.
The following assumptions are used for the Expressway simplified sizing deployments in Table 9-9 :
The following guidelines apply when clustering Cisco Expressway:
For more information on Expressway, refer to the Cisco Expressway Administrator Guide, available at
https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/unified-communications/expressway-series/products-maintenance-guides-list.html
Cisco Expressway Sizing Example
A company has 6,000 users, and on average 1,000 users are traveling at any given time. 80% of the mobile users require mobile and remote access at any given time. In this case, Expressway has to be sized to allow for 800 concurrent registrations (80% of 1,000).
Moreover, 10% of the mobile users are in a call at the same time. 5% of these users are calling through Expressway, while the remaining 5% are calling through the cellular network, so that the number of concurrent calls to the Expressway is 40 (5% of 800).
In the corporate network, 1% of the users are on a business-to-business calls at the same time. This accounts for an additional 50 calls (1% of (6,000 – 1,000)).
In this case we need to size the cluster to support 800 concurrent registrations and 90 concurrent calls (40+50).
Table 9-8 shows that a medium OVA template supports up to 100 concurrent calls and 2,500 concurrent registrations. We can therefore deploy an Expressway-C cluster consisting of two nodes using the medium OVA template, and an Expressway-E cluster also consisting of two nodes using the medium OVA template. Each Expressway server node can manage the whole amount of 800 registrations and 90 calls at the same time, as shown by Deployment 1 in Table 9-9 . Clustering is needed because, if one of the two Expressway nodes goes down, the other node can handle the whole amount of traffic. Under normal conditions, calls and registrations are load-balanced between the two nodes of the Expressway-C and Expressway-E clusters.
After some time, the business-to-business calls in this example increase from 1% to 3%. We now need to account for 190 concurrent calls (40+150) instead of 90. The maximum that a medium OVA template can handle is 100 calls, so we need to deploy a larger cluster in this case. Table 9-9 shows that Deployment 2 can account for 200 concurrent calls even in case of a server failure. Therefore, the administrator in this example decides to add another medium OVA node to the Expressway-C and Expressway-E clusters, for a total of 3 nodes per cluster.
Cisco Unified Border Element is supported on a wide range of Cisco routing platforms, including platforms such as the Cisco 4400 Series Integrated Services Routers (ISR) and the Cisco 1000 Series Aggregation Service Routers (ASR). Cisco Unified Border Element also provides redundancy on the following platforms:
Table 9-10 provides capacity examples for a few platforms. This table shows the maximum number of SIP trunk sessions, which corresponds to the maximum number of end-to-end PSTN SIP-SIP calls. It provides limits without media and signaling encryption and limits with RTP/SRTP interworking, where traffic is encrypted inside the corporate network and not encrypted for the connection to the SIP service provider. For information on other platforms and for more detailed, information including required amount of DRAM and flash memory, refer to the Cisco Unified Border Element Data Sheet and the Cisco Unified Border Element and Gatekeeper Ordering Guide, both available at
https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/unified-communications/unified-border-element/datasheet-listing.html
|
|
|
---|---|---|
Cisco Unified Border Element Sizing Example
A company has 10,000 users and has media and signaling encryption enabled in the corporate network. During the busiest hour, 10% of them are in a call at the same time. 8% of these users are calling external destinations, while the remaining users are engaged in internal calls. The Telecom carrier and the enterprise have agreed that G.711 can be used on all calls, therefore no transcoding is needed. For this deployment, 800 SIP sessions (8% of 10,000) are needed. Table 9-10 shows that a Cisco 4451-X ISR can support up to 1,400 sessions with encryption. Thus, for this example two Cisco 4451-X ISRs can be deployed, one active and one standby to provide redundancy.
This section covers sizing for Cisco Unity Connection.
As discussed in the section on the Cisco Unity Connection Deployment Process, the recommended Unity Connection deployment in this design consists of one publisher and one subscriber in active/active mode.
This guide covers three simplified sizing deployments for Unity Connection, depending on the number of users and the number of Jabber endpoints. These deployments are shown in Table 9-11 . For example, if a deployment has 10,000 users and 1,000 Jabber endpoints total, then at a minimum the 10k-user OVA template has to be deployed. Or for example, if a deployment has 6,000 users and 2,000 Jabber endpoints, then at a minimum the 10k-user OVA template has be deployed. There are other possible deployments with Unity Connection, but they are not covered in this guide. Refer to the latest version of the Cisco Collaboration SRND and product documentation for information on the other possible deployments.
|
|
---|---|
Cisco Unity Connection Assumptions
The OVA template limits should not be exceeded. For example, with the 5k-user OVA template, there is a limit of 200 ports with G.711 or 50 ports with G.722. For more information on the OVA template limits, refer to:
It is also important to consider the amount of storage required to store voice mail. The message storage depends on the size of the virtual disk. For example, the approximate message storage using the G.711 codec is 137k minutes with the 5k-user OVA template, which is defined with one vDisk of 200 GB. Note that with the 10k-user OVA template, different vDisk sizes are available to address different message storage requirements. For more information, refer to the latest version of the Cisco Unity Connection Supported Platforms List.
This section covers sizing for the following management services used in the Enterprise Collaboration Preferred Architecture:
The recommended deployment for Cisco Prime Collaboration Provisioning in this design consists of one node. There is no redundant node in this deployment. Back up your Cisco Prime Collaboration Provisioning virtual machine instead.
This guide covers two sizing deployments for Cisco Prime Collaboration Provisioning, depending on the number of endpoints. These deployments are listed in Table 9-12 . There are other possible deployments for Cisco Prime Collaboration Provisioning, but they are not covered in this guide. Refer to the latest version of the Cisco Collaboration System 11.x SRND and the Cisco Prime Collaboration Provisioning product documentation for information on the other possible deployments.
|
|
---|---|
Cisco Prime Collaboration Deployment is deployed as one node. There is no redundant node is this deployment. Back up your Cisco Prime Collaboration Deployment virtual machine instead. The single Cisco Prime Collaboration Deployment node can support a deployment of any size.
With Cisco Collaboration products that are deployed with virtualization, after sizing the deployment, the next step is to determine how to place the virtual machines together on the Cisco Unified Computing System (UCS) servers, which will ultimately determine how many UCS servers are required for the solution. This process is performed with the Collaboration Virtual Machine Placement Tool (VMPT), which requires a cisco.com login and which is available at https://www.cisco.com/go/vmpt.
Figure 9-1 shows an example of using VMPT for a deployment with 5,000 users and 5,000 total endpoints (including 1,000 Jabber endpoints). This example assumes that Cisco Business Edition 7000M is deployed. It does not include the Cisco Meeting Servers; we assume they are deployed on the Cisco Meeting Server 1000 platform.
Figure 9-1 Virtual Machine Placement Example Using VMPT
In general, in addition to using VMPT, it is a good practice to validate the virtual machine placement by ensuring that the deployment meets all the co-residency requirements documented at
https://www.cisco.com/c/dam/en/us/td/docs/voice_ip_comm/uc_system/virtualization/collaboration-virtualization-sizing.html
The main placement and co-residency rules are:
Even though the hardware platforms can be highly redundant, it is good practice to plan for hardware redundancy. For example, do not deploy the primary and backup application virtual machines on the same UCS server, as shown in the example in Figure 9-1. Instead, deploy primary and backup virtual machines on different servers to provide redundancy in case a host fails.
For the products that are deployed with virtualization, Cisco Business Edition 7000 can be an excellent solution. It is easy to order and easy to deploy. VMware vSphere Hypervisor (ESXi) is pre-installed. Business Edition 7000 is also pre-loaded with the Cisco Collaboration software set and some of the Cisco Collaboration applications are also pre-installed.