Contents
- Design Considerations
- Wireless Mesh Constraints
- Wireless Backhaul Data Rate
- ClientLink Technology
- Configuring ClientLink (CLI)
- Commands Related to ClientLink
- Controller Planning
Design Considerations
This chapter describes important design considerations and provides an example of a wireless mesh design.
Each outdoor wireless mesh deployment is unique, and each environment has its own challenges with available locations, obstructions, and available network infrastructure. Design requirements driven by expected users, traffic, and availability needs are also major design criteria. This chapter contains the following sections:
Wireless Mesh Constraints
The following are a few system characteristics to consider when you design and build a wireless mesh network. Some of these characteristics apply to the backhaul network design and others to the CAPWAP controller design:
Wireless Backhaul Data Rate
Backhaul is used to create only the wireless connection between the access points. The backhaul interface by default is 802.11a or 802.11a/n depending upon the access point. The rate selection is important for effective use of the available RF spectrum. The rate can also affect the throughput of client devices, and throughput is an important metric used by industry publications to evaluate vendor devices.
Dynamic Rate Adaptation (DRA) introduces a process to estimate optimal transmission rate for packet transmissions. It is important to select rates correctly. If the rate is too high, packet transmissions fail resulting in communication failure. If the rate is too low, the available channel bandwidth is not used, resulting in inferior products, and the potential for catastrophic network congestion and collapse.
Data rates also affect the RF coverage and network performance. Lower data rates, for example 6 Mbps, can extend farther from the access point than can higher data rates, for example 300 Mbps. As a result, the data rate affects cell coverage and consequently the number of access points required. Different data rates are achieved by sending a more redundant signal on the wireless link, allowing data to be easily recovered from noise. The number of symbols sent out for a packet at the 1-Mbps data rate is higher than the number of symbols used for the same packet at 11 Mbps. Therefore, sending data at the lower bit rates takes more time than sending the equivalent data at a higher bit rate, resulting in reduced throughput.
A lower bit rate might allow a greater distance between MAPs, but there are likely to be gaps in the WLAN client coverage, and the capacity of the backhaul network is reduced. An increased bit rate for the backhaul network either requires more MAPs or results in a reduced SNR between MAPs, limiting mesh reliability and interconnection.
Note | The data rate can be set on the backhaul on a per AP basis. It is not a global command. |
The required minimum LinkSNR for backhaul links per data rate is shown in Table 1.
54 |
31 |
48 |
29 |
36 |
26 |
24 |
22 |
18 |
18 |
12 |
16 |
9 |
15 |
6 |
14 |
- The required minimum LinkSNR value is driven by the data rate and the following formula: Minimum SNR + fade margin. Table 2 summarizes the calculation by data rate.
135 |
1 |
26.3 |
157.5 |
1 |
27.3 |
30 |
2 |
12.3 |
60 |
2 |
14.3 |
90 |
2 |
16.3 |
120 |
2 |
20.3 |
180 |
2 |
24.3 |
240 |
2 |
27.3 |
270 |
2 |
29.3 |
300 |
2 |
30.3 |
- If we take into account the effect of MRC for calculating Minimum Required Link SNR. Table 3 shows the required LinkSNR for 802.11a/g (2.4 GHz and 5 GHz) for AP1552 and 1522 with 3 Rx antennas (MRC gain). LinkSNR = Minimum SNR - MRC + Fade Margin (9 dB)
If we consider only 802.11n rates, then Table 4 shows LinkSNR requirements with AP1552 for 2.4 and 5 GHz.
ClientLink Technology
Many networks still support a mix of 802.11a/g and 802.11n clients. Because 802.11a/g clients (legacy clients) operate at lower data rates, the older clients can reduce the capacity of the entire network. Cisco’s ClientLink technology can help solve problems related to adoption of 802.11n in mixed-client networks by ensuring that 802.11a/g clients operate at the best possible rates, especially when they are near cell boundaries.
Advanced signal processing has been added to the Wi-Fi chipset. Multiple transmit antennas are used to focus transmissions in the direction of the 802.11a/g client, increasing the downlink signal-to-noise ratio and the data rate over range, thereby reducing coverage holes and enhancing the overall system performance. This technology learns the optimum way to combine the signal received from a client and then uses this information to send packets in an optimum way back to the client. This technique is also referred to as MIMO (multiple-input multiple-output) beamforming, transmit beamforming, or cophasing, and it is the only enterprise-class and service provider-class solution in the market that does not require expensive antenna arrays.
The 802.11n systems take advantage of multipath by sending multiple radio signals simultaneously. Each of these signals, called a spatial stream, is sent from its own antenna using its own transmitter. Because there is some space between these antennas, each signal follows a slightly different path to the receiver, a situation called spatial diversity. The receiver has multiple antennas as well, each with its own radio that independently decodes the arriving signals, and each signal is combined with signals from the other receiver radios. This results in multiple data streams receiving at the same time. This enables a higher throughput than previous 802.11a/g systems, but requires an 802.11n capable client to decipher the signal. Therefore, both AP and client need to support this capability. Due to the complexity of issues, in the first generation of mainstream 802.11n chipsets, neither the AP nor client chipsets implemented 802.11n transmit beamforming. Therefore, the 802.11n standard transmit beamforming will be available eventually, but not until the next generation of chipsets take hold in the market. We intend to lead in this area going forward.
We realized that for the current generation of 802.11n APs, while the second transmit path was being well utilized for 802.11n clients (to implement spatial diversity), it was not being fully used for 802.11a/g clients. In other words, for 802.11 a/g clients, some of the capabilities of the extra transmit path was lying idle. In addition, we realized that for many networks, the performance of the installed 802.11 a/g client base would be a limiting factor on the network.
To take advantage of this fallow capacity and greatly enhance overall network capacity by bringing 802.11 a/g clients up to a higher performance level, we created an innovation in transmit beamforming technology, called ClientLink.
ClientLink uses advanced signal processing techniques and multiple transmit paths to optimize the signal received by 802.11a/g clients in the downlink direction without requiring feedback. Because no special feedback is required, Cisco ClientLink works with all existing 802.11a/g clients.
Cisco ClientLink technology effectively enables the access point to optimize the SNR exactly at the position where the client is placed. ClientLink provides a gain of almost 4 dB in the downlink direction. Improved SNR yields many benefits, such as a reduced number of retries and higher data rates. For example, a client at the edge of the cell that might previously have been capable of receiving packets at 12 Mbps could now receive them at 36 Mbps. Typical measurements of downlink performance with ClientLink show as much as 65 percent greater throughput for 802.11a/g clients. By allowing the Wi-Fi system to operate at higher data rates and with fewer retries, ClientLink increases the overall capacity of the system, which means an efficient use of spectrum resources.
ClientLink in the 1552 access points is based on ClientLink capability available in AP3500s. Therefore, the access point has the ability to beamform well to nearby clients and to update beamforming information on 802.11ACKs. Therefore, even if there is no dedicated uplink traffic, the ClientLink works well, which is beneficial to both TCP and UDP traffic streams. There are no RSSI watermarks, which the client has to cross to take advantage of this Beamforming with Cisco 802.11n access points.
ClientLink can beamform to 15 clients at a time. Therefore, the host must select the best 15 if the number of legacy clients exceeds 15 per radio. AP1552 has two radios, which means that up to 30 clients can be beamformed in time domain.
Note | ClientLink is enabled by default. |
Configuring ClientLink (CLI)
From the 7.2 release onwards, it is not possible to configure ClientLink (beamforming) using the controller GUI.
Commands Related to ClientLink
The following commands are related to ClientLink:
- The following commands are to be entered in the AP console:
- The following commands on the AP console are used for troubleshooting:
- To show that ClientLink is enabled on a radio, enter the show controllers | inc Beam command.
The output is displayed as follows:
Legacy Beamforming: Configured Yes, Active Yes, RSSI Threshold -50 dBm Legacy Beamforming: Configured Yes, Active Yes, RSSI Threshold -60 dBm
- To show that ClientLink is Beamforming to a particular client, enter the show interface dot11radio 1 lbf rbf command.
The output is displayed as follows:
RBF Table: Index Client MAC Reserved Valid Tx BF Aging 1 0040.96BA.45A0 Yes Yes Yes No
- To show that ClientLink is enabled on a radio, enter the show controllers | inc Beam command.
The output is displayed as follows:
Controller Planning
The following items affect the number of controllers required in a mesh network:
- Mesh access points (RAPs and MAPs) in the network. The wired network that connects the RAP and controllers can affect the total number of access points supported in the network. If this network allows the controllers to be equally available to all access points without any impact on WLAN performance, the access points can be evenly distributed across all controllers for maximum efficiency. If this is not the case, and controllers are grouped into various clusters or PoPs, the overall number of access points and coverage are reduced.
- Number of mesh access points (RAPs and MAPs) supported per controller. See Table 1. For clarity, nonmesh access points are referred to as local access points in this document.
Local AP Support (nonmesh)1 |
||
---|---|---|
55082 |
||
25043 |
||
Note | Mesh is fully supported on Cisco 5508 Controllers. The Base License (LIC-CT508-Base) is sufficient for indoor and outdoor APs (AP152X). The WPlus License (LIC-WPLUS-SW) is merged with the base license. The WPlus License is not required for indoor mesh APs. |